The Olympics is the pinnacle of careers, a chance for the best in the world to compete to achieve their career hopes and dreams. This is a view that very much relates to the sport of gymnastics, everybody remembers the amazing performances of Nadia Comaneci, Lilia Podkopayeva among many more in Olympic finals thorough the ages. The sport of gymnastics is one of skill, poise and artistry where even the slightest mistake can be the difference between the gold medal and 10th! In this great sport the Olympics remains the most important indicator of career success, the title of Olympic champion is the one that people remember, the one that cements your place in history.
Unfortunately in this games, the pure brilliance of the sport is threatened to be overshadowed by the new ruling which has proceeded to banish American double world champion Jordyn Weiber, from fighting for her right to be crowned the best in the world even though she received the fourth highest score overall in the qualifying competition! Weiber made a slight mistake on the floor, which due to the brilliance of her fellow American gymnasts relegated her to being the third highest scoring gymnast from the USA, fourth overall in the competition, and therefore unable to compete as one of the 24 finalists vying for Olympic gold under new rules.
New Olympic rules state that in Olympic all around competition and in the finals of any individual apparatus, there are to be no more than 2 athletes competing for any one nation. In the final of the overall all around competition this equates to each nation being able to occupy just 2 of the 24 final berths regardless of how many obtain scores in the top 24 of all competitors.
There is obviously a very simple argument which is the fact that every gymnast will be aware of the rules pre competition, and that by only achieving third best qualifier from their country, they have had the chance to qualify for the final, but have failed. Therefore some blame can rightly be attributes to the gymnast themselves, as everybody has, in general, received the same chance to qualify. This argument however is flawed when the results of yesterdays qualifying results are investigated.
The overall best score during qualifying was that of Russian Victoria Komova, she achieved a score of 60.632 overall. One of her main challengers for the Gold medal Jordyn Weiber from the USA put a fantastic performance together on 3 of the four apparatus but made a mistake on the floor, reducing her score slightly but to an extent that she only managed to finish fourth overall with a score of 60.03, just 0.6 off the leader. Notice that I used the expression “only” when referring to the fourth best overall score in the world. The two further gymnasts that managed to beat her were both representing the USA and as a result the fourth highest qualifier for the women’s final is not regarded as one of the top 24 who will be allowed to compete for Gold later in the week.
In a competition in which the goal is to find the best three competitors in the world at a said sport, and to reward their excellent performances with a medal of three variety, it seems outrageous that only two of these medals can be taken by each nation. This surely makes the results of the final obsolete as the all of the very best gymnasts are not present in the finals. If you are fortunate enough to perform to such a high level that you win a bronze medal behind two athletes from a single nation, it creates a lingering doubt as to if you really are the rank of gymnast that you have achieved; or if actually, you have only managed to achieve that medal due to another athlete being unfortunate enough that two other gymnasts from her country achieved a better qualifying score. With a top gymnast such as Weiber eliminated unjustly, it can be argued also that the results of the games become less valid and people may talk about the result being the way it is only because of Weiber’s technicality elimination, rather that the results themselves.
By creating such a rule which goes against the values of the Olympics, in that the Olympics are held to crown the “three” athletes who are the best in the world and reward medals, many issues and future problems are sure to arise which ultimately display the loss of Olympics Gymnastics’ integrity. The rule itself has robbed no less than 4 deserving athletes, who were amongst the best 24 scores in the competition, of their chance to compete in the finals of the Olympics (Weiber 4th overall, Grishina 12th,Pinches 21st and Yao 22nd). To put into context what this means for the competition I alert you to the fact that the 24th qualifier for the final (28th overall best score) is Ashleigh Brennan from Australia. Her score overall was 54.32, a full 6.3 whole marks less than that of Weiber, yet Brennan will be allowed to compete for the title at the expense of the world-class Weiber who is a double world champion and has trained hard all of her life for a chance to compete, and even with a fall received the fourth best overall score. This is an individual event and therefore is a disgrace and to some extent a prejudice towards ones nationality that the “only” reason that she isn’t able to compete is that she is from the USA. There is no gain to having the 25th best athlete qualify for a competition at the 4th best gymnasts expense. At the 1996 games in Atlanta, the silver and bronze medals were awarded to Romanian gymnasts, silver medal went to Gina Gogean and the bronze was a tie between two more Romanian gymnasts Simona Amanar and Lavinia Milosovici. Under new rules one of these athletes would not have been able to compete at all in the finals, lowering the standard of the competition and also taking away one of their medals. Amanar’s experience gained in that final and the winning of the medal led to her achieving a Gold medal at the following Olympics in Sydney. If she had not been allowed to compete then her future could have been so much different and we could have been robbed of her wonderful performances from Sydney. In addition, Andreea Raducan was the initial winner of the Sydney 2000 games, but was stripped of her gold for substance irregularities. If this had not been the case the podium would have consisted of Raducan, Amanar and Maria Olaru, all from Romania, the likes of a clean sweep of medals for a country overall is now impossible under new rules.
The aftermath of this Olympic ruling could be disastrous. It isn’t unreasonable to think that athletes from successful nations will ultimately be a victim of their own success. Young athletes looking for Olympic experience such a as that of Amanar’s first games, will no longer be able to achieve that if they compete for a successful nation. This may in turn lead to them looking for ways in which to compete for alternative nations in order to stand a chance of qualification. If an athlete knows that she must beat two medal contenders in order to even qualify for the Olympic final, they are likely to struggle to see the point of wasting time training, knowing that a gymnast’s career rarely lasts more than 2 games in total. The ruling leads to a chance that only 2 athletes from each country will ever be seen in a final every 8 years which surely isn’t the point of sport, or the Olympics. The “plastic brit” issue which currently disturbs ethics in athletics could be soon duplicated now in Gymnastics as a result. This would be in the form of for exampe Russian and American gymnasts competing for nations of a lesser gymnastic quality, by finding loopholes such as ancestoral nationality.
Finally, the point of the Olympics is to showcase the very best Gymnastics for the entertainment of the crowd, and to see the highest level possible in the sport. With this new rule implemented in the sport, it is likely that those athletes at the top of the sport will perform very “safe” routines which are not as entertaining, safe in the knowledge that this should be enough to qualify for the final. Tghey may prefer to do this rather than, like Weiber, attempt to entertain the crowd and show her best moves and performance, but not quite achieve it and therefore miss out all together. There is no place for sentiment or giving the lesser gymnasts preferential treatment at the Olympic finals, that is the purpose of the qualification; the Olympics should be the pinnacle of all sport, the duel of the best athletes to reign supreme for four years. This rule destroys that notion and punishes the gymnasts unnecessarily, as well as the public who are viewing to see the best of their sport, I am sure we are yet to hear the end of the issue.